Revlon: Citigroup’s $ 1.2 billion mistake may save the sweetness big from chapter

Two years in the past, one of many largest banks on the planet made one of many largest errors in historical past. Now, this might find yourself saving Revlon.

Magnificence lovers have watched in horror as cosmetics icon Revlon filed for chapter final week with debt of as much as $ 14 billion, however there’s a main turning level within the saga that many people have missed.

The enduring magnificence model filed a Chapter 11 process – permitting corporations to restructure whereas being protected by collectors and persevering with to function – on the finish of final week, citing money owed of as much as $ 10 billion (AU $ 14 billion). ).

Revlon’s woes had been attributable to years of brutal competitors within the magnificence trade, coupled with inflation and extreme provide chain issues, whilst the corporate introduced that the model could be secure in Australia, with cash to pump. within the native arm of the corporate to maintain it afloat.

Now, consideration is popping to one of many largest scandals in banking historical past and it may find yourself saving Revlon.

The financial institution’s $ 900 million goes bankrupt

In August 2020, the world was shocked after information broke that Citigroup, one of many largest banking establishments on this planet, by accident paid $ 900 million (A $ 1.2 billion) of Revlon’s debt.

Circumstances are sophisticated, however in a nutshell, Citigroup was overseeing a Revlon mortgage from hedge funds together with Brigade Capital Administration, HPS Funding Companions, and Symphony Asset Administration, which opened in 2016 and required the make-up firm to make periodic funds. of curiosity as much as 2023.

On August 11, Citigroup was presupposed to administer a type of repayments from the financial institution to lenders, which ought to have been value a few million {dollars}.

However on account of human error and a severely sophisticated transaction system, a Citigroup worker by accident despatched the total quantity, successfully paying the complete mortgage three years forward of schedule and utilizing Citigroup’s money to take action. .

And that is the place it will get even juicier.

Often, when such an error happens – one thing that’s really moderately frequent, imagine it or not – the particular person or establishment receiving the wrong cost merely sends it again, shortly correcting the error.

Not this time.

As an alternative, most hedge funds not solely didn’t return the cash, but in addition refused to reply Citi’s more and more frantic calls.

Attorneys had been quickly referred to as, and ultimately, a choose blatantly dominated that the lenders may withhold the cash, though a courtroom battle continues to be underway over the remaining $ 500 million ($ A718 million) of mortgage fairness after Citigroup. appealed the choice.

In response to Bloomberg, if Citigroup had been to lose, “it may write off practically 15% of Revlon’s $ 3.4 billion ($ 4.8 billion) debt load right away, easing the corporate’s path to chapter.”

Revlon’s Large Mistake

In the meantime, different massive manufacturers will doubtless watch the Revlon essay nervously and hope to study from the sweetness big’s many errors.

Revlon, which lists Elizabeth Arden, Almay and Britney Spears Fragrances amongst its manufacturers and which is owned by billionaire investor Ronald Perelman and managed by his daughter Debra Perelman, reported a web lack of $ 67 million ($ 95 million ) from January to March.

Though the corporate has suffered from a variety of debt issues and world pressures, together with provide chain disruptions, Queensland College of Know-how retail professional Dr Gary Mortimer advised information.com.au that one in all its principal errors was dropping relevance with a youthful rising market.

“While you consider Revlon, you even have Elizabeth Arden, which is a type of traditional manufacturers that has been round for a very long time, however tends to indicate that the corporate has failed to reply to demographic change and the emergence of the youthful market,” He mentioned.

“Clients who purchase Elizabeth Arden at the moment are of their 70s and 80s, which reveals that even iconic manufacturers must reinvent themselves and reposition themselves or no less than create a brand new model for the rising market.

“Estee Lauder is similar kind as Revlon, however he developed MAC that actually appeals to a youthful viewers.”

Dr Mortimer mentioned that Revlon has fallen into the entice of “strategic inertia,” a typical development during which giant corporations which have been well-liked for many years imagine they’re too massive and profitable to fail, and due to this fact neglect to innovate and adapt. resulting in their downfall.

“We see this occurring so ceaselessly in retail manufacturers like Roger David, which has been in existence for 76 years and didn’t anticipate world quick vogue retailers to enter the market,” he defined. “They continued to promote the very same merchandise and now they’re gone.”

Revlon’s downfall has additionally been partly attributed to competitors from celebrities like Rihanna’s Fenty Magnificence and Kylie Jenner’s Kylie Cosmetics, in addition to Revlon’s lack of ability to make use of social media and embrace the YouTube make-up tutorial phenomenon.

Leave a Comment

A note to our visitors

This website has updated its privacy policy in compliance with changes to European Union data protection law, for all members globally. We’ve also updated our Privacy Policy to give you more information about your rights and responsibilities with respect to your privacy and personal information. Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our updated privacy policy.